Commit effectively

Ability to commit to deliberative outputs and therefore, set up exit costs in case of commitment drift (e.g. reputational damage or stakeholder backlash).

MINIMAL

EXTREME

Maturity

Opportunity

Importance

Neglectedness

Transnational

Read about assessment rating system

How this is performed now...

Commissioning authorities

Commissioning authorities publicly commit to the process or system and to acting on the outputs in some way.

Citizens' assembly organizers

Citizens' assembly organizers typically ask commissioners to commit to publicly responding to the final recommendations in written form. These commitments are made before the process begins, often on the invitation letters used to recruit participants.

Related Product Gaps

There are no related product gaps at the moment.

Commit effectively

How this is performed now...

Related Product Gaps

What practices protect commitments from reversal when leadership or staff changes in an organization or government?

What conditions allow commitments to remain binding when the regulatory or political environment shifts significantly after the commitment was made?

How do we measure commitment drift, i.e. commitments that have not stuck over time?

Under what conditions is it reasonable to not stick with commitments? (e.g. does the reversal of a commitment require an explicit mandate, either through an election or a subsequent deliberative process?)

What properties should commitments have to make them truly adaptable? (e.g. specificity vs. breadth, time boundedness, rules for how commitments evolve over time)

What are the internal barriers that prevent commitment from happening? (e.g. employee pressure, incentive systems, decision-making culture, organizational structure?)

What role can legal or compliance infrastructure play in embedding deliberative commitments into operations? Under what conditions can it be counter-productive?

What is the amount of carrots vs. sticks necessary to protect commitments internally?

Could there be templated approaches to socialising and developing internal commitments?

Commit effectively

How this is performed now...

Related Product Gaps

Related Goals and Research Questions

Goal: Ensure that commitments made by commissioning authorities to act on process outputs stick

What practices protect commitments from reversal when leadership or staff changes in an organization or government?

What conditions allow commitments to remain binding when the regulatory or political environment shifts significantly after the commitment was made?

How do we measure commitment drift, i.e. commitments that have not stuck over time?

Under what conditions is it reasonable to not stick with commitments? (e.g. does the reversal of a commitment require an explicit mandate, either through an election or a subsequent deliberative process?)

Goal: Ensure that commitments are sufficiently adaptable to changing circumstances

What properties should commitments have to make them truly adaptable? (e.g. specificity vs. breadth, time boundedness, rules for how commitments evolve over time)

Goal: Internal barriers that are removed within organizations to be able to make and act on commitments

What are the internal barriers that prevent commitment from happening? (e.g. employee pressure, incentive systems, decision-making culture, organizational structure?)

What role can legal or compliance infrastructure play in embedding deliberative commitments into operations? Under what conditions can it be counter-productive?

What is the amount of carrots vs. sticks necessary to protect commitments internally?

Could there be templated approaches to socialising and developing internal commitments?

Related Resources