What is the best democracy ROI
Fund the development of democratic processes most capable of tackling our toughest challenges.
Where can funding help improve key democratic capabilities the most? One goal of this map is to support foundations, philanthropists, and governments to identify where the marginal dollar can be put to the best use, by identifying the capabilities limiting deliberation’s quality, impact, scale, and speed. In particular, increasing deliberative process quality and speed is crucial in order to unlock use in the most critical contexts.
This page includes sections for:
Concrete products and infrastructure
These are products and infrastructure that have already been partially scoped, and that we have identified as clear needs. Please reach out if you're interested in funding these and we can help route you to people already working on implementation where they exist.
AI Assurance Infra (Bias, Accuracy, etc.)
AI In-Person Facilitator
AI Manipulation Detection System
AI Online Facilitator
Automated Recruitment Tool
Babelfish
Context Mapper
Decision Impact Forecasting and Modeling
End-to-end Assembly Software
Multimodal Tailored Learning Support
Opinion Mapper
Personal Deliberation Partner
Process Design Simulation Sandbox
Research Observatory
Smart Templates (AI-supported real-time format support)
Sortition Proof Layer
What needs to be done first
Resolving a few key bottlenecks has the potential to massively speed up the overall ecosystem. This is a list of goals that, once met, would improve the maturity of their parent capability but only for the capabilities that we’ve tagged as the most urgent because of either their importance in speeding up the rate of improvement (simulation and measurability) or because they fill critical gaps in getting processes to the point of “good enough” for near-term use cases (resisting manipulation and reaching participants).
Deliberative processes that can be tested and refined before implementation with real participants
Designers who understand the validity boundaries and appropriate use cases for deliberative process simulation
Participants who are able to accurately understand the potential impacts of their decisions.
Deliberations that can be captured faithfully and unobtrusively with full participant consent and ethical protection
Long-term effects of participation that can be tracked on individuals and their networks
Metrics of quality of deliberation that can be measured in real time, enabling facilitators to make adaptive process interventions
Preference transformation and participant learning that can be tracked throughout the process
Participants who learn as much as possible in the time available.
Tools that track the quality of individual and group learning within the deliberative process
Process outcomes that can be empirically measured and compared across contexts, processes and systems, enabling evidence-based improvements
Recruitment strategies that accommodate poor databases for identifying and accessing people locations with no mail access or poor access to the internet.
Response rates that enable selection algorithms to accurately select panels that represent the whole population by mitigating the impacts of self-selection biases.
There are cheap and efficient ways of recruiting participants that can account for differences in response rates to different types of invitation methods (mail phone door-knocking etc).
Assembly designs that are robust to both internal and external manipulation attempts.
Manipulation attempts that can be reliably detected and prevented across different stages of the assembly process.
Post-hoc verification that can establish that outcomes were not unduly influenced.
Ensure that commitments are sufficiently adaptable to changing circumstances
Ensure that commitments made by commissioning authorities to act on process outputs stick
Internal barriers that are removed within organizations to be able to make and act on commitments
Deep understanding of when, if at all, simulation can be helpful.
Deliberative processes that can be tested and refined before implementation with real participants.
Simulations that are accurate enough to be relied upon when decisions are needed rapidly (e.g. seconds minutes hours).
Governments that can legally bind themselves to the decisions of a deliberative process
Legal frameworks that provide definitions of different degrees of bindingness with timelines and enforcement triggers
Private organizations that can legally bind themselves to the decisions of a deliberative process
Low-hanging fruit
Democratic innovations are significantly underfunded, resulting in lots of low-hanging fruit. This is a list of the capabilities that we’ve rated with a “low” level of maturity and a “high” level of opportunity, meaning that these aren’t the biggest or most complex projects but are tractable and important contributions to improving processes. For example, something like “Curate Context” would significantly improve the way processes address the right problems and present the right information to participants, not to mention reduce the costs for commissioners, but wouldn’t involve massive engineering challenges.
Represent complexity
Reach participants
Manage data
Produce adaptable outputs
Curate context
Handle challenges
Make verifiable
Navigate ambiguity
Navigate conflict
Include voiceless perspectives
Build process workflows
Integrate wider-public
Optimize run-time
Manage subsidiarity
High impact niches
Many actors are working on the same obvious problems, leaving other key challenges comparatively neglected. This list contains capabilities that we’ve designated either “high” or “extreme” when it comes to neglectedness, and “minimal” or “low” in terms of maturity. There are reasons why some of these challenges have been neglected. Some call for entire teams to tackle a complex problem, like simulation and forecasting, while others are a little less glamorous and require specific knowledge of the processes and systems they pertain to, like output implementability, gathering process data, or activating learning in participants.